Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Mid Year Ratings are out....

Mid year ratings are out.

http://tinyurl.com/nln32y

Have fun with them.

Sorry for being so short, first post from phone.

38 comments:

  1. 1st comment post whoohoo... Now, let's start talking about tomorrow playoff matches. :)

    Thanks for the link Chris. Looks like you got any early bumped.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Red Benzon back to 4.5 :P
    Aaron Greene to 4.5
    Turpen back to 4.0! be my partner again!

    Michael Tran to 3.5. =P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ted Bradley got bumped up to 5.0

    ReplyDelete
  4. Neil Carpenter got bumped to 5.0

    ReplyDelete
  5. Omon and Odion back at 5.0

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tim Green back to 5.0?????? WTF

    ReplyDelete
  7. Do mid-year ratings usually stick? I know if you are over 50 the appeal is pretty easy. I'm wondering more about younger players. Are players that got bumped up pretty much stuck there for at least a year?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I sure do wish that USTA Texas would just publish the spreadsheet.

    Now I have to take the PDF export to Excel, parse the data and use pivot tables to find everyone by city.

    Tosha, since you read this can you work on this for next time?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I wouldn't be to worry about mid-year; but if you are not listed in mid-year and have an undefeated record; most likely you will be bumped up and end-of-year.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ned Boone down to 4.5.....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jason Kern 5.0.. Yikes

    ReplyDelete
  12. what does this even mean? obviously year-end ratings are still to come, but there aren't any league matches left. someone explain...

    ReplyDelete
  13. For Houstonians they're pretty useless. Cities like Dallas use them for their fall leagues.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Playoffs: 3.0 ladies

    Woodlands def Walden 4-1
    Kingwood is up on Copperfield 2-1

    ReplyDelete
  15. 4.5 Women bumped to 5.0 in Houston

    Only 2 Tiffany Burris and Abbe Ulrich.

    ReplyDelete
  16. John Burrmann mid year 5.0.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Here is a link to a sheet that has the data parsed for those who want to look at it across city, etc.

    It took me about an hour, would have been about a 20min exercise but there were a few people with middle names, four names, etc and that took me a while to work through.

    http://tinyurl.com/Men-Rating

    You want the tab called 'Cleaned_Data". The other tab has the text parsing in it.

    This is on dropbox. You should be able to get to it open right from the link in excel.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Good work Chris. It's certainly a lot easier to read and search than the one published on the TTA site. Appreciate the effort.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks. PDFs are great for showing someone something, but not for any analysis.

    Here is the ladies:

    http://tinyurl.com/Ladies-Rating

    ReplyDelete
  20. Rd 2 from ladies 3.0 playoffs:

    Kingwood def Woodlands
    Walden def Copperfield

    ReplyDelete
  21. all this ladies' 3.0 league talk is killing me

    ReplyDelete
  22. We were all 3.0 once...

    ReplyDelete
  23. Agreed and it's nothing personal. It just seems that the majority of readers/posters on this blog are 4.0 and 4.5 men who want to hear predictions and smack talk regarding the matches tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The evil empire will prevail!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Why are some ppl get early bump-up with undefeated league records; while other with undefeated league records and mediocre tournament records does not. I thought early mid-year rating does not include tournament results.

    NTRP is too mysterious.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It is very inconsistent and does not always make sense.

    Here is an example of why what you described could happen:
    Person A - undefeated summer season, gets mid year bumped.
    Person B - undefeated summer season, does not get bumped.

    Person A could have a higher rating within their current rating ie - 4.80 versus 4.74 which makes person A get bumped and person B not be bumped.

    One thing I would like to do if I had the time would be to harvest all of the records from tennislink, reverse engineer their system and create my own and see how they do it.

    One problem with closed source software is that no one knows how it works. Take Diebold (voting machines) or the Breathalyzer software. Both of these have been around for years and finally through legal channels they were both examined and found to be highly flawed.

    If USTA had the nuts they should publish their calculation methodology and make their source code available for examination.

    I am sure they pimp it out to Wipro or some other Indian slave shop that has no incentive to share their code.

    ReplyDelete
  27. it would be nice to know exactly what our rating is at least once a year.

    i.e. 3.xx, 4.xx, 5.xx

    ReplyDelete
  28. By the way, there is something called "The City Playoffs" that continues tonight....anyone want to talk about that?

    Main event is at Lee Leclear tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "Indian slave shop" ... I love it!!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. USTA doesn't make their methodology, or their source code, or anyone's two-decimal-point rating available because they suspect a few (LOL) bad actors would use that information to control their ratings. The lesser of two evils, perhaps.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Good point anonymous.

    I would simply challenge the methodology. Only after exploiting the weakness in methodology would I manipulate it for my own gain.....

    I am kidding. I am sure there would be those who would 'work' the system, but I am just interested in how they do it.

    Most people who know me would say that I am just being me.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Agreed. See you across the net at 12:30 perhaps, and we can talk about reverse-engineering after the match. I've harvested more than a few records so far.

    ReplyDelete
  33. seems to me that the mid year ratings are just another way to let people know that they should start losing matches if they don't want to get bumped up....

    ReplyDelete
  34. For Houston the mid year ratings don't mean much.

    Dallas uses them for what level you play in the fall league which actually feeds into sectionals for next year.

    Houston use to use it for the combo thingy in the fall, but that stopped a couple of years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I'm going to go out on a limb and pick all upsets tonight in men's 4.5, and that includes the 'evil empire.'

    Long live the underdogs.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Any scores or updates from LLTC?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Good day !.
    You re, I guess , probably curious to know how one can collect a huge starting capital .
    There is no initial capital needed You may start to get income with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

    AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
    AimTrust incorporates an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

    It is based in Panama with structures everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
    Do you want to become really rich in short time?
    That`s your choice That`s what you desire!

    I feel good, I started to get income with the help of this company,
    and I invite you to do the same. It`s all about how to choose a proper partner who uses your savings in a right way - that`s AimTrust!.
    I earn US$2,000 per day, and what I started with was a funny sum of 500 bucks!
    It`s easy to start , just click this link http://ykyticumec.easyfreehosting.com/irupaty.html
    and go! Let`s take our chance together to become rich

    ReplyDelete