Thursday, July 23, 2009

4.5 Sectionals Thumbnail Sketches

Sectionals is just a coupla' weeks away, so let's have an early look at how the flights are shaping up. Nice to see some folks from other cities putting their two cents worth in. It's all in good fun and a little trash talk makes things even more interesting. Sorry..I did this hurriedly. There may be even more misspellings, errors and bad grammar than usual!!!



Flight One

Dallas

Rusty Branch has again assembled a solid squad that will be favored to take their flight. He's doing it the old fashioned way this time. No "ringers", no self-rated players, no youngsters (I believe the youngest guy is 34). What he does have is a solid lineup with no holes. It was just twelve months ago when Eugene Davis was fighting for his life to put away Ricardo Martinez and secure a 4.0 win for his Springpark squad. He squeaked through and in no way did I think he'd be the top singles guy on a Branch team just a year later. That result was deceptive however: Davis had played singles in every match in the heat and was probably not at his freshest, and Martinez has proven to be a capable (though not elite) 4.5 singles player. Still, it will be a step up for Davis this year. The rest of the roster is filled with guys who've been to Sectionals a half dozen times. Brent James will be a really solid singles guy. Rusty himself can still play singles. I like Rusty, by the way...he once paid me a backhanded compliment after dismantling me two and three at Sectionals one year: "You're better than you look." I'll take any compliment I can get. Kern/Slezak, Huffman/Wescoup, Rusty, Donnie Pollard, Paul Kiron, Herget, Sumrow...they're all here and the doubles will be solid across the board.

Houston Wild

Hasker is good enough to have a spot on the roster of any team up in Dallas, and would start for almost all of them. The kid loves challenges and will get them if teams go straight up against the Deucebags....and why wouldn't they? The rest of the roster is filled with players who are unproven at this level. James Bui was amazing for the Deucebags in city playoffs, but he doesn't have what I call a "Sectionals-level" win under his belt all season. His best win is probably against Quack Bui or Simon Jim. The competition will be two notches tougher than Quack or Flad Patterson were. But Dat is talented and will have a chance to make his mark in Dallas. I watch some of the Deucebags doubles guys and I'm not wowed. All of them have some strengths, but the weaknesses seem a bit more pronounced than some of the players on the elite teams in Dallas. Guys with big games, like Trey Dugas, will have to be "on" for things to go well for this team. We saw earlier in the year when Tran and Trey beat Odion and Sumrall that it CAN happen, but it will be hard to string enough of those together to make this team a factor.

Amarillo

I don't know squat about these guys. The only thing I remember is that Shannon Burdett was on the Amarillo 4.5 team that went to Nationals, I believe that was back in '97 or '98. That's the team that was defaulting lines and yet still winning until they flew some people in for the semis/finals on Sunday. They've got only seven 4.5 rated players on their roster this year and I would be surprised if they do any damage at all. But every year there are unknowns who emerge...

Corpus Christi

These guys just keep coming back and back every year. They ought to just book their hotels now for 2010. Through the years they've had pretty good success, too, making it to Sunday on more than one occasion, if my memory is correct. A respected 4.5 observer told me that he's picking this team to make it to Sunday, as the wild card. I think this is based on his feeling that they may "fatten up" on Amarillo and the Deucebags, but he also told me there is a guy or two on the Corpus team that should not be underestimated. Little can be learned from the regular season in some of these cities. I think Peter Marsalek is a new player who will add a spark to this team and had some good wins against them last season, including one against the much-discussed Maingot. Marcos Villareal is back and he will help. Elizondo, Elizondo, Shandy, Cone, Whitehurst...they're all here, all another year older, but will be good enough to be favored in their matchups against Amarillo and Houston Wild.



Flight Two

Austin

Love him or hate him, it all starts with Chad Case. Just take a look at his results from 2007 when Mike Davis' crew made it to the National semis. Eleven absolute blowout wins in state until Odion took a set from him in the state finals. Then three more destructions at Nationals until he lost in the semis. Until someone takes him down he has to be considered the top 4.5 in the state, but he'll certainly have a target on his back. From what I understand he's a quicker version of Ted Pumma, with loopier groundstrokes. There appears to be a gaping hole at number two singles, at least based on their two matches with Old School, however, Lemke is a capable singles player. Rumor has it that Jones is their second best player, and he snuck in his second match against the Howitzers, so he's eligible. Rockey could play there if necessary, I imagine. If Creel doesn't make the trip the doubles will be weakened, but Schlotterback, Bowman, Seidensticker, Allen, et al are all capable doubles guys.


San Antonio

I watched some of the San Antonio team play last year at Sectionals and they were not that strong in singles, having to use Vince Giordanelli and other non-elites in key matches. They lost Louis Strawn from that team but have added Hilderbrand and Doyal among others. Doyal made the semis of a recent major zone in Open, straight setted the much discussed and DQ'd Burke Marold in another major zone, bageled Brett Sticker, etc. He will be a tough out. San Antonio seems to have the edge over everyone in the flight at line two singles. Clearly, John Trautmann will/can be used in singles as well. I don't see the doubles depth/strength on this team that seems to be present on some of the other teams. Arringdale/Miller are decent, but will be underdogs to many teams in Dallas. James Regmund did not get his two matches in.

Waco

Waco shocked some people last year (including yours truly), and may again have the chance to sneak up on some people. They may still be trying to solidify their roster (are they ever gonna' play their league?) and are reportedly trying to add some out-of-towners. That may be problematic, but time will tell. Luedtke and Rivera are still there, Mike Doty is a solid veteran. Andy Price has a doubles win earlier this year against Max Dunaev. Zane Martindale...who is he? Chris Fernandez? Another guy with no record. I haven't had time to Google these guys, but unknowns would worry me, but I'm sure Mike Miller and Mike Davis will know everything about these guys come August.

SETX

Quite a flight huh? Vernon and Mills will be a solid doubles combination, but this roster doesn't appear to have the strength of some others. I know they have a young singles guy that may surprise, and Abshire is feisty. Hunckler has been a solid performer in the past but is not having his best year. Dupelchin is decent. Anderson has Sectionals experience. But this team does not have the talent to advance out of this killer bracket.


Flight 3

Houston

They dominated locally and do have the talent to win the whole thing. My first question would be: Is David B. making the trip? Sure, they've got a ton of guys who can play singles: Omon, Odion, Ted P., even Sumrall showed he's a quality player in straight setting Steve Phan. But one extra stud can make a huge difference and can even further strengthen the doubles lineup. The depth here is ridiculous. It was less than twelve months ago when Andres Ballesteros and David Huffman were the deciding match sending their team to Nationals. Now I'm wondering if they'll even get on the court. Playing time will be at a premium. John Day has returned from injury and I would think he and Burrmann will be a partnership once again if Day is at full strength. Will they be vulnerable after the layoff...has Burrmann lost a step in the few years since I last played him? Based on what I've seen he doesn't appear to have faltered at all. Tim Green will be in the lineup, and I'd have to think that Sumrall and Tam have more than earned a spot. Lombardi is solid. Will the 3M's: Morgan, Martinez and Morton, find their way onto the court? How about Phong Regent?

Fort Worth

I have to admit I haven't looked at this team closely at all this year. Jerry Pham has been around forever and will find his way into the singles lineup at some point. Rob Hurley has been playing singles, but lost to former Houstonian Eric Bedient, who's pretty good but not "Sectionals-level". Darrell McCallum is one of the funkiest doubles guys in the state, but last year really looked like he'd lost a step and gone down a notch. Mark McHenry is a great guy and has really turned himself into a doubles player over the last 7 or 8 years. Robert Barrie will again be tough in singles...he straight setted Justin Huffman and Alejandro Sanchez last year. Cocanougher (Sr.) can still play. Are there any unknowns set to emerge from this roster? If not, I don't see this team being a big factor.


NE Texas

Chris Leach is back, for the umpteenth time. Mark Michaelson is on the team...he and partner Gary Bowles had a win against Green and Benzon earlier this year (neither of the Northeast Texans cracked a smile the entire match) but Bowles is not on the Tyler team for Sectionals. Jason Gound will capably man one singles spot. Serge Figueroa has been around forever and will find his way into the doubles lineup. Shannon Strickland and Bill Tankersley will play...but this team seems weak to me. The more I look at this bracket the more I think that the Hurricanes will be able to use a lot of the guys on their roster. (If I were captain, of course, I'd be scared shitless of all of these guys, but from the outside looking in they don't look at all fearsome).


Abilene

Okay, here's where it gets fun. We've all heard about the McMurray connection. Several of the players on the Abilene team are playing at the college level. Adam Cherry has shown himself to be dangerous in recent major zones. Trance Rosenquist and Ed Leija have some good stuff on their resumes. This team is dangerous. They're only 10 men deep, including our own Smitty, but the 4.5 format does not put a premium on depth. Chris Bumann was clearly easing up, I would think, in his second match at the qualifying tournament. We'll see how good McMurray's number one is in a coupla' weeks.


I'll give my "picks" at a later date, but clearly the Austin-San Antonio match is the one to watch. Houston-Abilene could be fun, too.


77 comments:

  1. Nice preview Htown. I just wanted let all the other 4.5 teams know that for the first time Houston will be sending a team with this much depth. I think that the last 2 teams Houston have sent to Nationals have been good, but this team has all the right combinations to pull off some big wins at every line.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where's the 4.0 scouting report.

    I know Freeman has a spreadsheet somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well done as always Greg. Some of the matches/matchups I'd love to be able to watch in pool 2 and 3 would be...
    Pretty much every match in pool 2 but these two for sure
    Austin vs. SA obviously especially a Chase - Doyal matchup
    Vernon/mills vs. Ludtke/Rivera
    Pool 3
    Houston vs. Abilene (that match intrigues me almost as much as Austin/SA but probably because I know so many of the players) especially a Bumann vs. David B or Oman, Odion/Green vs. Trance/Cherry (some big serves in that matchup and noone under like 6'3") A healthy Burman/Day vs. Rainwater/Leija. I guess I'd just like it if both teams let me write their lineups for my entertainment.
    Leach vs. Odion (come on Leach you could take him!)
    There's going to be some great tennis and you would be hard pressed to find a more entertaining pool at Sectionals anytime than pool 2 should be.
    My early picks for the semis would be Austin, Houston, Abilene (wildcard), and a sorry Dallas team. I certainly reserve the right to backtrack once I learn more and depending on which day you ask me about the SA/Austin match.
    On a side note in 4.0 I'm really hoping for a Dallas vs. Wild Houston matchup, so can you make that happen for me Htown?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh I forgot about the 5.0 Houston vs. Fort Worth match. Man, if I could just have Tosha adjust the schedule to my liking I could OD on great tennis. Freeman can you pull some strings for me?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yeah, that's definitely the 5.0 match to watch!

    I got just a glimpse of internet legend Eddie Hill on the sidelines last year. I have yet to see him hit a ball but already he's one of my favorites. If the stars are aligned just right maybe the two teams will meet...

    ReplyDelete
  6. IMHO 4.0 this year is boring and does not have the depth they need to take on other cities like in previous year. Especially when they barely made it through the playoff. Good luck to them all; but they will make a believer out of me if they are playing on Sunday's final in Dallas.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Freeman's 4.0 team has some great talent, but they were less than impressive in the playoffs. Competing in Sectionals is a much bigger stage and they will not make it out of their bracket playing the tennis they did at the City.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Having played against both hurricanes4.0 and SAP I can say with confidence that the hurricane's performance in city's was an anomaly and that if given a rematch, hurricanes would prevail 5-0. I wouldn't be surprised if Freeman asked for a less than stellar performance or put up an inferior lineup to give him some advantage for sectionals. Best of luck to both teams! I hope to be asked to join either squad next summer!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Freeman and Goodwin will be accepting resumes beginning September 1st.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What that old saying? If you had to ask then you are not good enough to join their team.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not true at all. Send me or Daniel your contact info and once EOY ratings come out we will start looking forward to 2k10.

    We have the best Player Incentive Plan (PIP) in the city.

    ReplyDelete
  12. thanks Chris... in addition I will forward to you my SAT scores...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Forget SAT. We only want people with post graduate experience.

    I will need GMAT or GRE scores.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It looks like that Dallas team is pretty stout again this year. The Houston team is the "all star" squad made up of a few teams, so I have to think they are damn good and the team to beat in Dallas.
    For the second straight year we have drawn the toughest team in the flight in our opening match against a stacked, SA team todecide our fate before noon on Friday. Man that's awful early to be looking down the barrel. Last year we lost to the eventual winner Houston the very first match and lost 3-2 with a couple of match points on two diffenent courts, so we were there. If we can bring our best players to Dallas, we do have a team that can matchup well with SA. I really think we are only going to go as far as our #2 Singles takes us. Gonzales, Lemke, and Torrez are going to have to step up their game for us to be playing on Sunday morning.
    I do have a question though, What is up with this Waco mess? How can they still be looking for out of town players and not have anything up on tennis link at all at this late stage. Hell,we could be playing almost anyone in that match. I don't think Waco is one of the cities on the "road to the US Open, so maybe we will dodge a bullet there.:)
    I look forward to seeing you all in Dallas. My pics, although I am obviously biased.
    Austin
    Dallas
    Houston
    San Antonio

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Waco team will win that flight. Mark my words.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I heard Waco recruited some of those foreign players that played for Baylor.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Waco will be lucky to get third.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Another option for the 2010 4.0 season is Lakeside. We got new courts and an excellent setting. We dont' require SAT scores nor state rankings. We will need to see drivers licenses....

    Cherokee 6

    ReplyDelete
  19. The Smokers don't even Require a licence.

    ReplyDelete
  20. For those of you captains trying to appeal the midyear ratings on-line, I have the updated team number to use.

    0000541347 is the correct team number to input along with the usta # of the individual appealing. This is the team number for men to appeal.

    I will update when the women's number is emailed to me.

    The original team numbers emailed to us were wrong.

    Tim Green

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dear Cherokee,

    No one likes to hear all that AARP propaganda though.

    Maybe it is a GenX or GenY vs. Baby-boomer thing?

    Haha

    ReplyDelete
  22. thanks for the post greg. judging by all the comments, it will be very hot and there will be no easy matches...thats EXACTLY what ive been waiting for!! cant wait to go :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. it's not going to hot.. it's going to be fffffkkkkkkkkking hot.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'll be thinking about ya'll while laying in around the pool in the shades drinking my alcoholic kool-aids.

    Sincerely,
    Glad I lost in Playoff - so I don't have to drag my fat ass to Dallas to melt in the fffffkkkkkgggg hot sun.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Houston will Rock the Big D come Aug 7. 4.0 and 4.5 Men and Women! I predict the 4.5 Men and Women will be buying tickets to Tucson. 4.0 Men and Women both have solid teams and if the stars align could be taking the trip too.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thanks for the confidence in us Deucebags, glad to have the city's support!

    ReplyDelete
  27. The Deucebags had a losing record this year. We should of got a second team instead of Houston.

    ReplyDelete
  28. If they're buying tix to tucson they'll be missing Nats. It's in Vegas this year!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well the way it has gone down, if Waco does win Sectionals we may not even know it until Christmas for gods sakes! WTF

    ReplyDelete
  30. Waco, who you got? You gonna roll out George Bush Jr?

    Tee hee! - michael jackson

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rumor has it that Peter Rothe will be the out of towner that Waco is recruiting. Didn't he make it to sectionals back in the 90's?

    ReplyDelete
  32. What would they call the Waco team then? Team Ja***ss?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Waco should be penalized for not having completed their matches if they truly play any matches in their "sham" league. Houston players have to declare their teams by 6/30 and compete in the city playoffs, and deadlines exist for other cities. Do I sense a little favoritism in Waco's favor?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Waco should be called: "Team Fat Has-Been"

    ReplyDelete
  35. Wacko is always just that. It is a smoldering pile sitting right in the middle of desolation, most recently fouled by the Bushes, so let's all make allowances for those poor bastards!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Why make allowances for anyone? What makes Waco anymore special than Abilene, South TX, NE TX, SE TX and the other small cities. Everyone is giving them a hard time, so why not rag on Waco to.

    ReplyDelete
  37. By the way, the Waco 4.5 league is now "official". I'm not sure how they were planning on getting the out of towner into a match since tennis link says all of the league matches were played in May and June. Regardless, all eleven players on the Waco roster got at least two matches in and will be eligible for Sectionals.

    ReplyDelete
  38. What a freaking joke that league is! It looks like the two set up teams played the good team twice each, however, the two set up teams never even bothered to play each other. They both only show 4 losses and those were to the REAL team. What exactly would you call that anyway? You certainly cannot call that a legit league. This is exactly the kind of so called, "league" that the USTA needs to do something about. It would be laughable, except that it is not funny at all, when you think about it, it's sad, really sad. It is so much of a sham that they did not even feel the need to play the other worthless matches since they did not affect Rivera's team. How crystal clear scamming the rules, and in your face to boot. Nice job boys! Way to show us how to cheat and get away with it! If they have such a good team, why did they not just go play the QT and get in the front door lke real men.

    ReplyDelete
  39. WACKO league is fixed. Looked at the scores entered. Good
    job WACO. Don't worry you'll be out of contention on Friday.

    ReplyDelete
  40. That team is begging to be shitcanned! The USTA should bag these fools and let another wild card in the tournament. Someone that played by the rules, maybe? This is a continual problem of fairness in the Sectional system that is crying out for a change.
    Since the USTA allows this from them and others every year, I hope the teams in their flight wipe the court with these clowns!

    ReplyDelete
  41. I am curious as to which one of you guys on the Waco we should salute for your scam, Rivera, or Doty? One of you should stand up and take a bow for this epic performance. Is this what you have come to in tennis? I dare one of you to say anything?

    ReplyDelete
  42. How strong is the Waco team ?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Waco has some players who will shock the world next weekend. Beware.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Waco won't do surprise anyone. They better just be glad they are at Sectionals.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I emailed Tosha about this crap a week ago (NE TX League too). Per usual, she must have just hit the delete button and went about her day. Not even a response. JOKE.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Waco league match played 5/31.

    Really!?! So Luedtke & Rivera were able to fit in a league match on the same day they were playing the Waco MZ singles Semi (against each other) AND the Waco MZ doubles Semi & Final.

    What a piece of work. Carry on TTA. Nothing to see here.

    ReplyDelete
  47. These aren't the droids you are looking for....

    ReplyDelete
  48. The Waco scam is up there with San Antonio registering players to play in tournaments and then sending someone else in their place so they will obtain a computer rating.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Alright Htown, time for your predictions.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Please keep the little girls off this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I can easily predict the 4.5 sectional winner...Houston. The team is stacked and there is no way anyone at sectionals can beat them. I know some/most of their players and I sadly predict they will win.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Someone should bypass Tosha and her delete button and email the USTA that is over the Texas section.

    ReplyDelete
  53. My predictions? They're biased, of course. Did I pick Bobo/Teague/Benzon's Noho team to make it to Nationals last year? I hope I did. Anyway, two flight winners are "obvious" picks: Houston and Dallas. Either may lose, but it's really hard to logically pick against them. I'm gonna' go with Austin to win the other bracket and then I'm guessing that Abilene fattens up on two teams and then loses maybe 4-1 to the Hurricanes but sneaks into Sunday. Just a guess. The Huricanes will take it all, I think. But I'm biased, obviously.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Whaaaaaaaaa! My team lost and I cant go play!

    ReplyDelete
  55. The odds of Houston beating Abilene 4-1 are ZERO. That kid at #1 singles lost in the quarters of the ORANGE BOWL years back. It does not end there either. H town I have you guys losing that one 3-2. Be ready !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  56. The guy that says Houston will win easily clearly does not know what he is talking about. They can definitely win but will need some good bounces. If they get through it will be 3-2 in a few matches.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Bumann = the "1" in 4-1.

    ReplyDelete
  58. How bad will Bumann crush someone like Omon or Odion?

    ReplyDelete
  59. why is Bumann, McMurry's #1 singles player playing in 4.5? Is this allowable per the USTA rules?

    ReplyDelete
  60. If he played in the Orange Bowl and made it the quarters and he is the college player of the year in D3, I'd think he would be out of level.

    I'm hoping Bumman and Omon square off. Abilene doesn't have to like that match up at all.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Hurricanes will be a team with a lot of strong experienced players. I can't see anyone matching their depth. Abilene will have its hands full on the 1st match with Fort Worth.

    In the 2nd match Abilene vs Houston expect some fireworks.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Abilene has some very solid lines and very possibly the strongest singles player at 4.5 Sectionals. However, I think Houston has the best team on paper at Sectionals. I'm really looking forward to the matchup. I'm picking Houston 3-2. It will be a lot of fun to watch.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I disagree. Why would he be scared of Omon ? He played in the Orange Bowl. Are you serious ? Omon might win but I seriously doubt it, but I can assure you the kid is licking his chops. It's 4.5 and 5.0 tournaments Omon is playing. The kid should be ineligible that is for sure. He's gonna spank that axx. That's for sure also.

    ReplyDelete
  64. What happens if Abilene makes it to Nats ? Won't they be in the middle of college tennis.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I'm a worrier. I know Freeman and Benzon don't share my obsession with seeing everything that can go wrong. I don't know their lineup for their first match, but I think they should load up while still keeping people fresh, if that's possible. Screw the "get everyone in" philosophy and save that for the last match. If Bumann is an automatic W then they have to take 3 outta' 4 of the other lines. Cherry beat Green three and one earlier this year. Leija and Rosenquist are dangerous. Wasmer and Fowlkes were 2-1 at Sectionals last year. Kick ass in the first match and then you've got an insurance policy (wild card) in case you stumble against Abilene.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Abilene will lose to Fort Worth. The big match will be on Saturday when 2-0 Houston plays 2-0 Fort Worth.

    ReplyDelete
  67. That sounds suspiciously like a Hurricane hopeing Abilene will wear itself out against Ft. Worth.

    ReplyDelete
  68. H town you guys are good. I'm not taking anything away from you guys. Abilene is the real deal. WORN out ! I think they will be okay playing 2 matches a day with super busters lol. Htown Hacker I don't know you but you got this one right on. I think Bumann either did not lose a match or lost one match all year. It is D 3, but you still have studs at lots of these schools. He should be a DQ. The rest of the Abilene is going to come hard as well.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Abilene is the real deal? Come on we know that Abilene has some Mcmurry University players. Obviously Bumann is supposedly a stud. D3 player of the year? Congrats to him on that. This is 4.5 Sectionals and college players come and go. This will not be the first time a Houston team has to overcome obstacles. Come Friday Hurricanes will let their racquets do the talking. If Abilene is good as they think they are then they'll back it up with a solid win.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Abilene is the real deal? Come on we know that Abilene has some Mcmurry University players. Obviously Bumann is supposedly a stud. D3 player of the year? Congrats to him on that. This is 4.5 Sectionals and college players come and go. This will not be the first time a Houston team has to overcome obstacles. Come Friday Hurricanes will let their racquets do the talking. If Abilene is good as they think they are then they'll back it up with a solid win.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Exactly it's 4.5 sectionals. That is the point.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Wasn't everyone worried about Rainwater last year ? And didn't he get crushed a couple of times ?

    ReplyDelete
  73. Houston is taking home 4 titles this weekend. Guaranteed

    ReplyDelete
  74. Houston will be lucky to take home 2 titles, one of them being Betsie's team.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Know Greg already did a poll kind of like this, but stack rank chances of winning:

    Men's 5.0, 4.5, 4.0
    Women's 4.5, 4.0

    Women's 4.5 Hollis even w/o Cori
    Men's 4.5 Canes
    Men's 4.0 Canes
    Women's 4.0 Mason Creek
    Men's 5.0
    Men's 4.0 SAP
    Women's 4.0 Longwood

    ReplyDelete
  76. That sounds about right, except there's no love for Deucebags. I would put them above SAP.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Sorry Dbags - forgot about you. You're spot on where they would fit.

    Women's 4.5 Hollis even w/o Cori
    Men's 4.5 Canes
    Men's 4.0 Canes
    Women's 4.0 Mason Creek
    Men's 5.0
    Men's 4.5 Deucebags
    Men's 4.0 SAP
    Women's 4.0 Longwood

    ReplyDelete