Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Boring week

There are not any/many interesting matches on the docket this week.

In 4.0, Copperfield's Shock and Awe takes its 4-1 team on the road to play Cinco Ranch's undefeated Comets. Copperfield has a huge defecit in a tiebreaker situation. They will need a win this week and some good breaks the rest of the way to make it to city playoffs.

In 4.5, Ssshhhwings host Lakeside in an effort to keep their small playoff hopes alive. Lester Callaway was impressive last week in the #2 singles slot for Shwings and is now 4-0 on the season.

Division III has a virtual 3-way tie for first place, but none of the teams figures to be tested this week. Every set may end up being crucial. The Hurricanes have the toughest match this week, but we'll see what kind of Taylor HS brings on its trek to LLTC.

95 comments:

  1. Which city has the toughest competition en route to sectionals? Houston? Dallas? San Antonio? Austin?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Based on volume of teams/players I would suggest Houston.

    Dallas does theirs differently where teams from fall/spring make the city playoffs that feed into city championship.

    San Antonio/Austin would be right behind HOU/DAL IMHO.

    Places like Waco/Tyler other towns of this size have it the best. Recruit and make one strong team and stomp on everyone locally and then feed into sectionals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. -schwing's only chance is to take at least 1 singles and two dubs. good luck winning 2 lines of dubs against lakeside.
    -lakeside will need to win to guarantee a spot in playoffs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. - houston has been the top dog in 4.5 in the last few years.

    2004 mob squad: sectional finals
    2005 swat: nationals
    2006 down year
    2007 crush: sectional finals
    2008 crush: sectional finals
    2009 hurricanes: nationals

    -amazing streak. it will end this year though.

    -in 4.0

    2009 hurricanes: sectional finals
    2008 down year
    2007 hurricanes: nationals
    2006 two teams in semis

    before that, not much.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In 2008 Noho won Sectionals at went to Nationals. I'd say Houston is pretty dominant in 4.5's. Houston has also had back to back Sectional Championships in 5.0 in 2009,2008.

    ReplyDelete
  6. interesting scenario.
    -lets assume lakeside ends season 7-1, they will have the advantage in overall wins
    -a lost or win for duecebags against lakeside is irrelevant for duecebags. if they win, they will still have to beat coaches and if they lose, they will be 7-1. if katy coaches beat gtac and schwing, the final match with duecebags will determine who gets the second spot. if coaches win, they are in, cuz they will have more overall wins then duecebags.

    just a thought

    ReplyDelete
  7. Only problem with that scenario is that the coaches suck.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Houston Mens Sectional Results since 2003 (Semis, Finalist, Champs):

    2003:
    5.0 - Finalist
    8.5 Combo - CHAMPS

    2004:
    4.0 - Semis
    4.5 - Finalist
    5.0 - Finalist
    5.5 - Finalist; NATIONALS Finalist

    2005:
    4.5 - NATIONALS
    5.5 - Finalist
    7.5 Combo - Finalist

    2006:
    3.5 - Semis
    4.0 - 2 teams in Semis
    5.5 - NATIONALS - Semis
    7.5 Combo - Semis

    2007:
    3.5 - NATIONALS
    4.0 - NATIONALS
    4.5 - 1 Finalist & 1 Semis

    2008:
    Tri-Level - Finalist
    4.5 - Finalist (Houston)
    4.5 - NATIONALS (NOHO)
    5.0 - NATIONALS
    Open - NATIONALS - Semis
    8.5 Combo - Finalist

    2009:
    Tri-Level - NATIONALS
    4.0 - Finalist
    4.5 - NATIONALS
    5.0 - NATIONALS - Finalist
    Open - Finalist
    7.5 Combo - CHAMPS
    8.5 Combo - CHAMPS

    2010:
    Tri-Level - NATIONALS

    ReplyDelete
  9. Houston has done pretty well. Good Job Htown tennis players!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I know the post is titled "boring week" but are we really reminiscing about previous years teams?? Let's at least get back to who the favorites will be at City.

    I'd say Lakeside, Duecebags,Westside,and Copperfield will be battling it out for the (hopefully) 2 spots at sectionals. Can't wait to see the match ups with these teams. How would you rank their chances in order??

    ReplyDelete
  11. Everyone is underestimating Lakeside. They will easily win Houston and will be a favorite for nationals when sectionals comes around. Lakeside is every bit as good Dallas, Austin and San Antonio. If you are not already a believer, you will be.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Now that's going out on a limb making that statement. You must be a Lakeside team member. Win Houston 1st then you can talk. Until then,enjoy that country club atmosphere and relax.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Was just wondering. No one has really said much about the fact that this is the first time in, How many years, that Freeman/Benzon's 4.5 team is not the clear cut favorite. Is this because of the new ratings or the other captains have out-recruited.

    ReplyDelete
  14. who does Lock play tonight?

    ReplyDelete
  15. to 11:09: it's because they focused on the NOHO team rather than Houston. That team will be up there with ones from the past.

    Saying that Lakeside is a clear cut favorite for nationals is a major stretch. They are probably the favorites in City but Westside, Copperfield and Duecebags will all challenge them. D-bags seem as good as last year and these are the best teams WS and copperfield have ever put together.

    There may not be a "super team" at City but the match ups will be the most intereting in years- especially since everyone will play eachother.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Could someone explain why the Houston All Stars have to play for NOHO in the "off" seasons". The 3 person rule still applies no matter which city you play for.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I just looked at NoHo's roster. If I'm not mistaken they are still eligible to pull 1 more player from the 2009 Nationals team. Still don't understand why they have to play NoHo instead of Houston.

    ReplyDelete
  18. NOHO is a superior league. They play regular scoring and play out the third set. Plus, weekends are more convenient for some people.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Case in point is why battle the lights at LLTC/MPTC if you don't have to. Why play a long season and even a playofs if you don't have to. Seems logical that Noho is win and your into Sectionals.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Then why not just play out of NoHo every year. Just keep THE Team up there instead of playing Thursday nights and dealing with City Playoffs.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Somwtimes there is not enough participation in Noho for the league to form. Luckily b/c of 4.0 bump ups the league made. Good point though about playing league every year out of Noho.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The other Noho teams are not competitive.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I agree that Saturday, regular scoring, and full third set is desirable! Dont mind the thrid set breaker as much as the No-Ad thing. Also, dislike having to split team match times (ie 7pm for some, 8pm for others)- takes away from the team feel etc. I understand why as can not start much earlier nor play much later and court availability. But if you played on Saturday like Austin, SA, Dallas etc you could have time slots of 9am,11am,1pm,3pm. This gives you 4 time slots at every location rather than 1-2 on a evening. Thus allowing to get rid of No-Ad and if desired play a full third set as time no longer the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Too much talk...let's fight!

    ReplyDelete
  25. I for one would like to see the Houston "All-Stars" stay in NOHO each year. It makes it much more fun and compeitive for the rest us.

    ReplyDelete
  26. All the "ALL STARS" are on Lakeside's and Deucebag's rosters!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Lakeside 5-0 tonight over Shwwinng !!

    ReplyDelete
  28. rothe, callaway, albers are still undefeated

    ReplyDelete
  29. You really want me to list all the Lakeside guys who are undefeated? How about a Shwinng loss tonight and they're out.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lakeside will get their comeuppance. Soon.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Lakeside is NOT the runaway favorite for City. As for D-bags, they are not any better than Copperfield and Westside, all three of which are just below Lakeside.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Lakeside would lose 4-1 or 5-0 to NOHO once the NOHO roster is complete. Just sit back and watch boys. Sit back and watch.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Lakeside crushed Shwwing tonight 5-0. BTW Mr. 4:27 All 3 players that were undefeated loss last night. LAKESIDE IS THE REAL DEAL. I'm a believer.

    ReplyDelete
  34. As I stated last week, all teams except for Black Sheep & Lobsters will lose some talented player(s) from their roster, including Lakeside come playoff time. If Lakeside kept their roster totally intact they are good, but not at the level of the NOHO Team. Craig Bobo

    ReplyDelete
  35. The Rolido Boys lost their 3rd in a row.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Who won the Black Sheep v. NWO re-match?

    ReplyDelete
  37. Who cares. That match is meaningless

    ReplyDelete
  38. Don't look now, but the Katy Coaches are becoming a factor. Having spent one year as the coach of the illustrious Cy Ridge Rams Junior Varsity tennis team, I'm pulling for them to make some noise.

    Trip Norkus (Strake Jesuit JV) was 0-6 last year...this year he's been lights out teaming mostly with James Weaver. He's had four straight set wins with Ed Hess and Ricky Barrera among his victims.

    Maybe the coaches will add one of last year's top players, former Alief Elsik head coach Aaron Layman, for their playoff run. The meat of the schedule remains, but they do control their own playoff destiny.

    ReplyDelete
  39. NWO beat Black Sheep. Wow

    ReplyDelete
  40. Can't imagine the match had any real significance to Black Sheep. They've all but clinched. Still a surprising loss. They better be careful about being too complacent with the rest of the schedule.

    Convincing Lakeside win. They are definately legit.

    ReplyDelete
  41. -NWO, just gave themselves some life. looks like a 3 way rat race in div2 and div3.
    -lakeside pretty much secured their spot in city. they still need a win from either duecebags or ball hawks.
    -i'm pulling for a deciding match between katy coaches vs duecebags in the final week.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Is it possible to get a strike in an HTA league match? It doesn't seem like it should be possible since 4.5 player can play in 4.0 league as long as he plays #1. But I don't know the answer.

    ReplyDelete
  43. They can't that's only in the Fall/Spring when its 4.0+

    ReplyDelete
  44. In the Spring league you can get a strike. In the Fall league you can't.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Ok, I believe you, Numbers Guy. However, I want to know how you know that spring results count in computing NTRP and can generate strikes.

    I've scoured the web and I can't see any public statement on this. This fact strikes me as very fishy if a league that doesn't feed into the USTA playoffs can somehow generate strikes and change your ratings. In particular, it's a beautiful way to tank your rating way down in preparation of the summer league.

    If this is true, HTA needs to either tell the TTA to stop doing this or inform all of its league members officially of the fact. The current situation is baloney.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I have always heard that the spring leagues effect your rating. I thought that was common knowledge. I didn't know that you could get strikes there though. So a player could start summer league with two strikes already? Seems like it might be risky to play the HTA leagues then. Could Cheryl or Diane or Tosha or Todd Reid comment on this? Or could Numbers Guy tell us where he got this from or confirm it with some body?

    ReplyDelete
  47. To be honest, I can't recall at the moment where I learned that Spring matches count against your ratings and Fall matches don't, only that I heard it from more than one source that I considered reliable. Towle may recall where he learned it. I'll see if I can track it down further. But case in point, look up Alejandro Daniel Baiz's 2010 record. In the Spring league he played and won three matches, the first USTA matches of his career evidently, by an average score of 6-0, 6-1, and was DQed from 3.5 level at that point. He's doing almost as well at 4.0 BTW.

    As far as not being able to find definitive information on it, I think this is how the USTA prefers it. Their general belief, and I don't disagree, is that the more people understand the inner workings of the system, the more those few bad actors will manipulate it. And yes I do see more evidence (in the numbers of course) of people manipulating their Spring results than I do their Fall results.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I have spoken with Tosha in the past and confirmed what NumbersGuy stated. The fall season does NOT count in the ratings; only the Spring and Summer.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I was just looking at Baiz's record this morning. I was wondering if the DNTRP he generated in the HTA season put him at a high enough starting point for him to be in jeopardy of "striking out" twice in one year. That would be impressive.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Numbers Guy, thanks for the info. The reason that I think that knowing whether spring match count towards NTRP is that some teams like to play up in the spring. This leads to many more matches between players at different levels which I don't think that the computer is equipped to deal with very well.

    For example, I was a 4.0 who played 4.5 in the spring and fall. I was bumped last year despite lousy 4.0 results during the summer. I suspect that the prime reason that I was bumped was that I happened to beat a 5.0 in a spring doubles match. (In hindsight, I wonder if the 5.0 tanked that match.)

    If I had know that spring results counted, I'd probably just play 4.0 leagues in the spring to avoid situations exactly like that.

    ReplyDelete
  51. If the spring match results count, HTA should move to spring setup in which league winners qualify for city playoffs in the summer. I know that there are some logistical issues with this, but other cities seem to manage it.

    Once nice byproduct would be that players would tend to play more at level.

    ReplyDelete
  52. When I played up in Dallas the fall season win would get you an automatic playoff bid so the competition was much better that here in Houston during the season. It would be cool if we did it here so you'd see less tanking and less people playing up that really shouldn't.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Zachary put on a show last night!

    ReplyDelete
  54. Your right. Watching Zachary's serve getting broken was H I L L A R I O U S !! Great Show.

    ReplyDelete
  55. He should have hit those guys in the face. The guy is way too nice.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Was that the one game you watched?

    ReplyDelete
  57. 5-1 and 5-0 leads, sounds like pretty nice ratings management to me! Lakeside seems to be making an art of that this year.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Who is good enough in this league to tank games. I would love to hear it.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Apparently, some players on Lakeside's roster are capable of tanking games b/c they are just that good.

    ReplyDelete
  60. How does Moser dominate the previous 5.0 league in singles, and not be 5.0.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Because the so-called 5.0 league is composed of scrubs.

    ReplyDelete
  62. So is the 4.5 league.

    ReplyDelete
  63. How come no talk about Hurricanes? They look pretty good on paper. Do they have a shot at making a Sectionals run in 4.5's?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Lots of talent in the 4.5 league this year, just not concentrated into super teams. Noho going straight to Sectionals is weak.

    ReplyDelete
  65. What talent? Out of all 19 4.5 Houston teams with current rosters I don't think you can assemble a team that would be comparable to Dallas, San Antonio or Austin. I would say there is a lot of parity in Houston 4.5 but I think it is a big stretch to say there is a lot of talent.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I could make one to win it without dropping a set!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Keep dreaming dude. Who would your all star lineup could be that would beat Branch, Torres or AustinWild?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Moser
    Medford
    Hess
    Nguyen


    Is a good start. Would be pretty easy to assemble doubles.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Moser 5.0 league?? Must have been a singles league that no one played in. He would get taken to the cleaners by the likes of Arun Nanjappa or Alim Mambetov and any of the other 5.0's playing league. He might have a chance against some of the 4.5's playing up or Self Rates who are not truly 5.0's. As far as 4.5 goes, it it true that Houston 4.5 is much weaker this year than in a long, long time. The NOHO Team will be the saving grace for H-town, and will be able to compete with Dallas, Austin, & San Antonio. H-town ought to be proud. We always back up our statements by results. The other cities talk big every year, but rarely seem to break through. Every summer the blogs say it's going to be Dallas, Austin, or San Antonio, but H-town or NOHO (North Houston) always seems to step up big. There's no doubt that all 3 are always very good and this could be one of their break through years, but don't count NOHO out. They are already far deeper than any HTA Team just coasting to Sectionals, and they haven't even completed their all star roster. Whomever represents HTA will either be a rookie team or if the D-bags go... it'll be their 2nd appearance. The NOHO Team can not only play numerous guys at either singles or doubles, but they all have a lot of Sectional and some National experience. The HTA Teams have very little of that, plus they do not have the depth to rest their stronger players in the August Dallas heat. They must play them every round or face early elimination. NOHO will represent H-town well this summer and if they got all of their horses up there healthy has a chance to advance again.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Apparently the poster at 3:20pm has no idea what the competition is like at Sectionals. The 4.5 singles comp at Sectionals is the likes of players such as: Chad Case, David Wanja, Ted Pumma, Hasker, Dibuas. Players like Lock,which everyone is complaining about might not win all his matches at Sectionals. So, which one of these guys (in 3:20pm poster's comments) can hang with these guys? I am not sure who will be this year's studs, but Dallas, Austin, SA, and H-town or NOHO always find them, hide them well until Sectionals, and then slug it out up in the Big "D". Who are the singles studs this year Greg?

    ReplyDelete
  71. Any top 20 NCAA D-1 player like lock will will ALL his matches at 4.5 or 5.0 period...get real~

    ReplyDelete
  72. Not so fast 9:18pm poster. Lock most likely would win all matches at 4.5, but not hands down. And at 5.0, Lock wouldn't have beat Jason Pieters nor is assured of beating Alim Mambetov. If the elite 4.5 players are true 5.0 plus players, then the elite 5.0 are truly 5.5 to open players. You still don't get that this rating problem is a national USTA issue, not just local. Unless you have been to Sectionals & Nationals & have seen the talent there, it's hard to comprehend. Trust me, Lock is not the only former D1 player in the nation that has bypassed the checks & balances. Ha-ha! What checks & balances.

    ReplyDelete
  73. What are you guys talking about??? Yes, the depth and talent at 4.5 and 5.0 in Texas is great but if you think Lock would lose (or almost lose) to these guys, you are kidding your selves. This isn't Wanja sneaking into 4.5 after playing at Lamar or even somebody that occasionally played #3 doubles for a major program. This is a guy that played #1 in the big ten and had a good record. It's a different level.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Jason Pieters played #2 in the ACC. I think it's pretty clear that he was the best 5.0 in the state last year. Lock would decimate anyone in 4.5 and just about everyone in 5.0.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Omon beat Jason Pieters last week in the finals of the beer league.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Lock played #1 in the Big 10 with a win over GTs #1....head to head proof that he is better that pieters

    ReplyDelete
  77. How do I get into the beer league?

    ReplyDelete
  78. when and where?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Lock this and Lock that. WHO CARES ???

    ReplyDelete
  80. We care because Lock is a cheater. Self-rate 4.5 is unbelieveable. MPTC should truly be ashamed and I can't believe that noone has protested.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Don't worry Red will, unless he can recruit him for next year.

    ReplyDelete
  82. No one cares about Lock. He'll be playing this week and things will go on like scheduled.

    Any Predictions for the Lakeside vs Deucebags match up this week?

    Borkop vs Hess
    Nguyen vs Bui

    Dugas/Tran vs Connell/Wright
    Ballesteros/Huffman vs Vu/Zachary
    Dugas/Morales vs Huynh/Nguyen

    Those would be some good matches.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Deuce Bags line 3 doubles is not as good as most 4.0 playoff teams.

    ReplyDelete
  84. What, Ward doesn't make top lineup?

    If Ward plays, Duecebags win 3-2. If Ward is benched, Duecebags 4-1.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Ha Ha. Seriously though...Ward is about half the player he was a year or two ago. He was decent then. 4.0 is just around the corner for that guy. Its tough to get old.

    ReplyDelete
  86. There is no doubt his ability is hovering around the 4.0 level but his mouth continues to run itself at the ATP-level.

    ReplyDelete
  87. If Ward's talk was as good as his game he would be at Roger F.'s level.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Locke needs to be DQd. How come it hasn't been done yet.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Yesterday's 2:28 poster said it best. Lock's team is not a threat to go to citywide and many coaches would want to have him on their 4.5 team in the future. If his being DQ'ed had an impact on the top teams, then it would be done. Since it's not, we'll see where this lottery pick will end up next summer.

    ReplyDelete
  90. That's just plain stupid. It will end up being a situation similar to Trent Broach. He was on Jedi Knights at the time I think and no one bothered to DQ him. Then when he ended up on Red's team everyone started whining. If you don't say something now then shut your big fat mouth next year when Locke is on the Canes and they're going to Nats.

    ReplyDelete
  91. He can still be DQ'ed next year; fraudulently self-rating doesn't have a 1-year statute of limitations just because he becomes a C at YE10. Red wouldn't take that risk.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Have any of you guys thought about he may be playing just for fun, that he didn’t self rate 4.5, that he doesn’t want to compete or anything like that. And, that he is really good, but he is not in this to win anything, that he just want to play tennis. You guys worry to much. Seriously!!!

    ReplyDelete
  93. That is the dumbest statement I've ever seen on here which is saying a lot. Why the hell would anyone who is 2 years out of major D1 tennis play 4.5 league for FUN??? That is like a true 4.5 playing 3.0 tennis for fun. This "oh shucks, he just wants to get out and play some tennis" crap is a weak defense of outright cheating.

    If he didn't self-rate 4.5 then his captain did and should be ashamed. It's not this grey area work the system crap- it is CHEATING. He should be DQ'd and banned for a couple years from USTA league play of any level if he self-rated. If his captain did it then he should be the one suspended.

    ReplyDelete